By Bill Bischoff
Last year’s massive health care law included a bunch of tax changes. Very few are taxpayer-friendly. The good news is the most expensive ones won’t kick in until 2013 and beyond. But some of the changes take effect this year. Here’s the list:
No More Tax-Free Health care Account Withdrawals for Non-Prescription Medicines
If you participate in an employer-sponsored health care flexible spending arrangement (FSA) or health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) or have your own health savings account (HSA), you could previously take tax-free withdrawals to pay for non-prescription drugs like pain and allergy relief medications. Starting this year, tax-free withdrawals are only allowed for prescription drugs, insulin, and doctor-prescribed over-the-counter medications. In other words, you now need a doctor’s prescription—which probably means a doctor visit you’ll be charged for–to take a tax-free withdrawal to pay for aspirin. And they call that reform?
Stiffer Penalty on Non-qualified HSA Withdrawals
If you take money out of your HSA for any reason other than to cover qualified medical expenses, the pre-2011 rules said you owed federal income tax plus a 10% penalty tax. The health care legislation increased the penalty tax to 20% for non-qualified withdrawals that occur in 2011 and beyond.
New Tax on Drug Companies
The health care legislation imposed a new non-deductible fee (which I will call a tax) on manufacturers and importers of branded prescription drugs. Each targeted company must pay an allocable portion of the total annual fee, which is $2.5 billion for 2011. The fee is apportioned among targeted companies based on each company’s share of sales in 2010. I’m still waiting for an explanation of how this will improve our nation’s health care situation.
New Simplified Cafeteria Plans for Small Employers
This one is a taxpayer-friendly change. The health care legislation established a new and simpler type of cafeteria benefit plan for companies with 100 or fewer employees. Such plans allow workers to pay certain expenses (including eligible health care costs) with pre-tax dollars. That increases workers’ cash flow after considering taxes. These simplified cafeteria benefit plans will be deemed to automatically satisfy all applicable nondiscrimination rules if minimum standards for eligibility, participation, and contributions are met.
Employers Must Show Health Insurance Costs on Employees’ W-2s
Finally, the health care legislation requires employers to report the cost of company-paid heath insurance coverage on employees’ W-2s issued for 2011 and beyond. These amounts are not taxable (yet); they are for informational purposes only. However, the IRS has already suspended this requirement for 2011 because gathering the necessary information proved to be too difficult for many employers.
Readers, which of these will impact you most?

Mult succes in continuare, mie mi-a placut
******
It’s a Little off Topic but Anyone Looking for a Job
Should Check Out this Website!
They are Hiring People to Work from Home for $77 / hour
http://www.CNN-Job-Report.com-employment.com
Getting into the Online Business has
Really Saved my Family from the Recession!
And I Can Work from Home with my Kids !
They are Hiring Today.
*******
HSAs did not previously cover vitamins or aspirin (except the 81 mg aspirin prescribed as a blood thinner). Now the physician recommended Zantac which I take and is over-the counter will require a prescription. This is a nuisance and unlikely to cost me a co-pay but puts an added cost burden on the health care system. The issues which are raised in this column are just further examples of the poorly thought out legislation which produced this bill – a major missed opportunity to provide significant improvements in our health care system. Perhaps the biggest negative is the impact on our economy with the added cost burdens for employers.
Excuse me, but I don’t think taxpayers should be subsidizing purchases of aspirin and vitamins. Sounds like a needed reform to me.
What a misleading impression this articles provides
Are you telling me, the problems of OTC payment and penalty withdrawals are REALLY worth complaining about? Sure some people will be slightly affected, but penalties can be avoided by contributing less, and abuse of using monies slated for medical issues for OTC drugs will stop. Do you need to go to the doctor for aspirin, or can you just buy generic for $4.99 at the supermarket…
The obvious overlooking some of the substantial benefits of the plan, for these minor issues, is nothing more than a jaded review by a biased author. There are some real issues with the plan. Why not focus on those…and have some interesting dialogue.