By Rachel Ochman
When the IRS’ own top dog hires a professional tax preparer because the tax code’s gotten too complex, it’s probably safe to say that things have gotten out of hand.
There’s no shortage of facts and figures that speak to tax code headaches. The IRS’ taxpayer advocate blanketed the code with criticisms–ranging from its 3.8 million word count to the 6.1 billion hours it takes Americans to prepare their returns each year—in her annual address to Congress.
Now, the most recent By the Numbers column goes a step further to ask a question many taxpayers would applaud–and courts could consider audacious: Is the tax code too complex to be constitutional?
Section 6702 on frivolous tax submissions –on page 600-and-something of the 2010 code–enumerates the “loopholes” that won’t excuse filers from paying up, and smacks a hefty $5,000 fine on those who try them. (Until 2006, the penalty was $500 per offense.) Taxpayers have even taken the government to court, arguing as far-fetched a defense as tax-law compliance being a form of slavery, and thus a violation the 13th Amendment. No dice, unsurprisingly.
So what’s an overwhelmed taxpayer to do? Can we be held accountable for rules we don’t understand? This hardly seems fair.
A taxpayer could, theoretically, pay taxes as usual and then file for a refund, according to the article. The filer could then claim “complexity” is a violation of due process of law (protected by the 5th Amendment). But the likelihood of circulating through this process without the $5,000 frivolity fine is pretty slim. At this point the filer could sue, though the government would most certainly argue the case is settled by legal precedents. That’s a lot of coulds and ifs to even get there. And the process wouldn’t be cheap. But, perhaps such a case could make a point?
“Everyone knows it’s unfair, but you’d never be allowed to argue that in court,” as the column points out via Daniel Pilla, a tax litigation consultant and the author of 11 books, including “The IRS Problem Solver.”
Readers, do you think our Constitution protects us from an obscure and overworked tax code? Should courts lend an ear to the argument?