SmartMoney Blogs

Pay Dirt
A daily look at what we buy, how we spend, and the companies that do right - and wrong - by their customers.

Poor Retail Sales Could Mean Bigger Deals


Department stores will have to drop prices to get consumers through the doors this holiday season, experts say — earlier opening hours just won’t cut it.

While October sales were buoyant, helped by winter sales, retails figures for November and December are expected to be about half over last year. The National Retail Federation says total retail spending is expected to rise just 2.8% through December — significantly less than the 5.2% spike in spending last year.

These lackluster predictions mean department stores will have to compete for your dollar and – in an effort to lure consumers and appease shareholders –they will need to have some headline grabbing bargains to tempt people through their doors.

“Overall, I believe we will see better sales this holiday season,” says Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO and co-founder of in Arlington, Va. “Retailers will use the better sales to try to counteract the negative effects of uncertainty about the economy, low consumer confidence and the persistently high unemployment rate.” But there’s a downside to any rush by retailers to be the first with their bumper discounts. “Black Friday itself will be worse than last year,” says Jeff Green, an independent retail analyst based in Phoenix, Az. “With the sales season starting in September it just dilutes the importance of Black Friday.” Green says holiday spending will be flat this year, or up 1% in a “best case scenario.”

Retailers are already trying to get a head start on Black Friday. Target, Macy’s, and Kohl’s have all said they would open for the first time at midnight on Thanksgiving, which Papadimitriou and Green say could create a domino effect of smaller stores across the country trying to beat the big stores to the punch. As Pay Dirt previously reported, for some stores the sales never end.

But some experts say never say never: Consumers might rally. “Our forecasts are not terrible,” says Kathy Grannis, an NRF spokeswoman. “A 2.8% for November and December increase is a very real look at what retailers can expect. We had a particularly strong Black Friday last year. At the end of the holiday season retailers were in awe that consumers had so much spending power.”


We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.

Comments (2 of 2)

View all Comments »
    • By WebOsPublisher

      Lock Database icons. Images of Lock Database icon from different collections
      Lock Database Icons
      Icon list
      Lock Database Icons
      You can purchase these icon images for your projects. Click on icons to purchase them.
      Lock database Perfect Table Icons
      Lock database Perfect Internet Icons
      Lock database Perfect Database Icons
      Lock database Glossy Data Icons
      Home | Products | Downloads | Order | Icons | Support
      Copyright © 2005-2012 Icon Empire. All rights reserved.
      Stock Icon Packs
      People Icons for Vista
      Perfect Toolbar Icons
      Business Toolbar Icons
      Database Toolbar Icons
      Multimedia Icons for Vista

    • By WebOsPublisher

      Coroners And Justice Bill | Panopticon Blog
      What is Information Law?About Panopticon
      Visit the 11KBW Website
      Click ‘Tags’ to show or hide the tag cloud.
      article 6
      article 8
      Article 10 ECHR
      data protection
      data sharing
      employment monitoring
      employment vetting
      environmental information
      First-tier tribunal
      High Court
      ICO powers
      Information Tribunal
      judicial review
      legal professional privilege
      local authorities
      national security
      personal data
      public authorities
      public interest
      section 12 FOIA
      section 14 FOIA
      section 27 FOIA
      section 30 FOIA
      section 32 FOIA
      section 35 FOIA
      section 36 FOIA
      section 40 FOIA
      section 41 FOIA
      section 42 FOIA
      section 43 FOIA
      section 44 FOIA
      social networking
      vexatious requests
      whether information held
      Search for:
      This blog is maintained for information purposes only. It is not intended to be a source of legal advice and must not be relied upon as such. Blog posts reflect the views and opinions of their individual authors, not of chambers as a whole.
      11KBW Resources
      Act Now Training
      Article 29 Working Party
      Australian Privacy Commissioner
      Centre for Freedom of Information
      Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs
      Electronic Frontier Foundation
      European Data Protection Supervisor
      FOI Man
      FOI News
      Ibrahim Hassan
      Information Commissioner’s Office
      Information Law Practice
      Information rights and wrongs
      Information Tribunal
      Ministry of Justice
      National Association of Data Protection Officers
      New Zealand Privacy Commissioner
      Northumbria University Information Rights LLM
      Open Secrets blog
      Out-Law website
      Scottish Information Commissioner
      Surveillance and Society
      UCL Constitution Unit
      UK Freedom of Information Blog
      Virtual Shadows
      Your Right to Know Blog
      December 2012 (1)
      November 2012 (9)
      October 2012 (6)
      September 2012 (10)
      August 2012 (8)
      July 2012 (8)
      June 2012 (11)
      May 2012 (6)
      April 2012 (11)
      March 2012 (11)
      February 2012 (15)
      January 2012 (5)
      December 2011 (5)
      November 2011 (13)
      October 2011 (2)
      September 2011 (6)
      August 2011 (3)
      July 2011 (8)
      June 2011 (4)
      May 2011 (5)
      April 2011 (6)
      March 2011 (13)
      February 2011 (10)
      January 2011 (13)
      December 2010 (13)
      November 2010 (12)
      October 2010 (7)
      September 2010 (3)
      August 2010 (5)
      July 2010 (10)
      June 2010 (11)
      May 2010 (7)
      April 2010 (2)
      March 2010 (13)
      February 2010 (4)
      January 2010 (12)
      December 2009 (3)
      November 2009 (15)
      October 2009 (5)
      September 2009 (1)
      August 2009 (5)
      July 2009 (2)
      June 2009 (7)
      May 2009 (10)
      April 2009 (15)
      March 2009 (11)
      February 2009 (7)
      January 2009 (10)
      BMA Expresses Concerns about New Data Sharing Powers
      February 18th, 2009 by Anya Proops
      The Coroners and Justice Bill was introduced in the House of Commons on 14 January 2009. Clause 152 of the Bill provides for the Data Protection Act 1998 to be amended to include a number of new provisions on data sharing. Those provisions include a section which creates a broad general power enabling any ‘designated authority’ to make an ‘information sharing order’, which is to say an order which enables ‘any person to share information which consists of or includes personal data’ (new section 50A(1)). The relevant designated authorities’ are ‘appropriate Ministers’ (i.e. Secretaries of State, the Treasury and Ministers in charge of government departments); Scottish Ministers; Welsh Ministers and a Northern Ireland Department (new section 50A(2)). Whilst these broad powers are subject to a number of limitations including those provided for under new sections 50C, 50A(4) and 50A(6), this has not prevented concerns being expressed as to the potential risks entailed upon these new provisions. Most recently, in an interview with the Guardian (14 February 2009), theВ British Medical Association’sВ Chairman, Hamish Meldrum, confirmed that he was ‘extremely concerned’ about these new data sharing powers,В not least because they would potentially enable Ministers to allow patient data to be shared not merely within the NHS but also with other ministries and even private companies. Mr Meldrum said that theВ trust between doctors and patients would be destroyed if the Bill became law as it stands. The new powers embodied in clause 152 of the Coroners and Justice Bill follow in the wake of the development of another significant and controversial data sharing scheme under which the medical records of everyone in England are to be uploaded onto a national database, known as the Spine.
      The Bill:
      Guardian Articles:
      Tags: Coroners and Justice Bill, data protection, data sharing, medical, privacy Posted in 1 | No Comments »
      Coroners and Justice Bill
      January 24th, 2009 by Timothy Pitt-Payne QC
      The Coroners and Justice Bill was introduced into the House of Commons on 14th January 2009 and will have its Second Reading on 26th January 2009.
      The title sounds remote from information law; but Part 8 of the Bill contains some В important proposedВ amendments to the Data Protection Act 1998.В 
      In the first place, there are provisions giving the Information Commissioner new inspection and audit powers in relation to government departments and certain other public bodies, in order to assess their compliance with the Data Protection Act.В  These appear to be a response to the well-publicised series of public sector data losses over the last year or so.
      More controversially, the Bill makes provision for information-sharing orders, designed to facilitate the use of personal information for purposes other than those for which it was originally obtained.В В Data sharing is a subject of long-standing debate (especially within the public sector);В В  it was recently considered in the Wolpert/Thomas data sharing review.В  The Bill is intended to bringВ greater clarity to this area.В В В The proposals have however drawn a hostile response fromВ some civil liberties groups concerned with personal privacy.В 
      For the full text of the Bill as introduced, see:
      For a Ministry of Justice paper explaining the various powers to make delegated legislation that are contained in the Bill, see:
      For the Wolpert/Thomas review, see:
      For criticism of the proposals, see:
      Tags: Coroners and Justice Bill, data protection, data sharing, ICO powers Posted in INFORMATION LAW | No Comments »
      11KBW, 11 King’s Bench Walk, Temple, London EC4Y 7EQ | Tel: 020 7632 8500
      Terms $ Conditions | © 11KBW 2009

About Pay Dirt

  • Pay Dirt examines the millions of consumer decisions Americans make every day: What to buy, how much to pay, whether to rave or complain. Lead written by Quentin Fottrell, the blog examines these interactions, providing readers with news, insight and tips on shopping, spending, customer service, and companies that do right – and wrong – by their customers. Send items, questions and comments to or tweet @SMPayDirt.