.

SmartMoney Blogs

Encore
A blog about living in and planning for retirement

With 401(k) Enrollment, Auto Isn’t Enough

istockphoto
Despite getting automatically enrolled in 401(k)s, many still aren’t saving enough

A growing number of companies began  automatically enrolling new employees in their 401(k) retirement savings plans in the wake of the 2006 Pension Protection Act — and the impact on participation rates has been dramatic. According to Aon Hewitt Associates, a consulting and outsourcing company, about 57% of large companies now automatically enroll new employees in 401(k) plans, up from 24% in 2006. While employees are free to opt out, few do. As a result, companies that use auto-enrollment report average participation rates above 85%, compared with 67% for those without auto-enrollment.

Better still, a new report from Vanguard finds that automatic enrollment is raising participation rates among all racial and ethnic groups, eliminating gaps created when white and Asian 401(k) participants voluntarily enroll at higher rates than their black and Hispanic counterparts. (For the numbers, see my colleague Catey Hill’s summary.)

But despite this trend, auto-enrollment has not led to equal savings rates among the four racial and ethnic groups. When Vanguard analyzed 2010 data “for more than a quarter million participants in seven large defined contribution plans,” it found that “whites and Asians are more likely” than blacks and Hispanics to raise their savings rates above the level their employers selected when automatically enrolling employees. (Employers typically set employees’ initial default contribution rate at 3% of salary.) As a result, savings rates “for whites and Asians with auto enrollment are about 0.5 to 2 percentage points higher than those for blacks and Hispanics,” the report says.

Why do whites and Asians save more? (The report found that Asians saved the most among the four groups.) Stephen Utkus, head of Vanguard’s Center for Retirement Research, says the researchers controlled–or adjusted–the data to account for differences in income, wealth, age, and job tenure among the four groups. His best guess? “Cultural differences” or gaps in financial literacy could explain the lower savings rates for blacks and Hispanics.

How can 401(k) sponsors close the gap in savings rates? One solution may be to implement automatic escalation–a feature that increases employee savings rates by a set amount, typically one percentage points a year, until reaching a certain threshold.

Still, Mr. Utkus says, “It’s a big question as to whether auto-escalation features will help.” “We have such limited data. On average, people in plans that automatically escalate contributions have experienced only one automatic increase thus far.” As a result, he adds, it’s too soon to know whether employees of different racial and ethnic groups whose contributions are automatically escalated will behave in a similar way–for example, by sticking with the higher contribution rates–or not.

Comments

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.

Comments (1 of 1)

View all Comments »
    • To cover the government shortfall of income, tax rates will have to go up. 401K is not a good idea anymore. Save after tax money. Pay tax now. Tax is on sale. You never know what the tax rates will be by the time you retire. Government can find other ways to confiscate your retirement savings as well!

      http://www.tradingstocks.net/html/pension_plan.html

      The root cause of the crash is excessive debt. Entire nation cannot borrow non-stop, inflate the money supply and prices with borrowed money and then hope that all will be fine when the pay back time arrives.

About Encore

  • Encore examines the changing nature of retirement, from new rules and guidelines for financial security to the shifting identities and priorities of today’s retirees. The blog also explores news that affects retirement, from the Wall Street Journal Digital Network and around the web. Lead bloggers are reporter Catey Hill and senior editor Jeremy Olshan. Other contributors include The Wall Street Journal’s retirement columnists Glenn Ruffenach and Anne Tergesen; the Director for the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Alicia Munnell; and the Director of Research for Pinnacle Advisory Group, Michael Kitces, CFP.

.