.

SmartMoney Blogs

Encore
A blog about living in and planning for retirement

3 Ways the Debt Deal May Impact Seniors

iStockPhoto

To the relief of most Americans, lawmakers have finally agreed upon a deal to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; to the relief of many seniors, this deal means that Medicare and Social Security are safe for now.  But that doesn’t mean you won’t see these benefits cut – or other changes that might hurt your bottom line – in the future.  Here are some areas to keep an eye on:

Medicare

As I reported on SmartMoney.com Tuesday, Medicare may be vulnerable in the second round of cost-cutting required by the deal.  In effect: if the special joint committee doesn’t find at least $1.2 trillion in additional savings, Medicare provider payments are scheduled to be automatically cut by up to 2%. (Your personal Medicare benefits will not automatically be cut at this stage, though the committee could vote to cut them as a way to generate the needed savings.) For consumers, this may mean that some doctors will stop accepting Medicare patients and that hospitals may close units, says Mary Johnson, a senior policy analyst for the Senior Citizen’s League, a non-profit seniors rights advocate. And in looking for savings, the committee may consider plans like lifting the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 or increasing co-pay amounts, says Joe Baker, president of the Medicare Rights Center.

Your Nest Egg

If you use municipal bonds in your portfolio to produce income, the deal could hurt your bottom line.  The reason: a decrease in federal spending could mean less aid for state and local governments, which, in turn, might make some already-strapped states more vulnerable to downgrades, according to Matt Fabian, managing director of Municipal Market Advisors, an independent research group.  What’s more, many estimates suggest that the deal would cut economic growth by roughly one-tenth of a percent, which could, in turn, hurt your bottom line.  Read more here.

Social Security

Unlike Medicare, Social Security isn’t scheduled for any automatic cuts if the special joint committee can’t find that $1.2 trillion-plus in additional savings. But experts say that doesn’t mean that these benefits are guaranteed safe in the future.  The reason: In looking for that cost savings, the committee could recommend cuts to Social Security.  One such consideration might be a change in how the consumer price index (CPI) is calculated, which would likely lower your COLA payments, says James Horny, vice president of fiscal policy for the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.  (Read more about this CPI measure here.) The reason this plan is appealing is that it produces likely cuts in Social Security spending, while also raising tax revenues, experts say.

Comments

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.

Comments (5 of 16)

View all Comments »
    • What academic writing…

    • Curiously, a well written piece of writing…

    • This makes perfect sense to anyone…

    • Some informational blog post

    • I don’t understand why there is never any outcry to prevent congress from taking the Social Security funds for pet project. My understanding is that this figure amounts to 2 to 3 billion per year. Cuts should be considered after these excess funds are calculated. My understanding is that if we can stop this robery there is no problem. These polititians spend these monies because thy are not contributing to the system. They have conveniently excluded themselves so this is money that they are completely detached. DANGER. They must find another way to sqaunder money. Perhaps equating their salary to the state of the economy

About Encore

  • Encore examines the changing nature of retirement, from new rules and guidelines for financial security to the shifting identities and priorities of today’s retirees. The blog also explores news that affects retirement, from the Wall Street Journal Digital Network and around the web. Lead bloggers are reporter Catey Hill and senior editor Jeremy Olshan. Other contributors include The Wall Street Journal’s retirement columnists Glenn Ruffenach and Anne Tergesen; the Director for the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, Alicia Munnell; and the Director of Research for Pinnacle Advisory Group, Michael Kitces, CFP.

.