SmartMoney Blogs

Real-Time Advice
Our real-time advice on how market shifts and news impact you and your money

Is the Kindle Fire Costlier Than the iPad?

Amazon’s Kindle Fire tablet helped account for a  35% spike in sales during an otherwise disappointing fourth quarter, the company reported today. Though buyers may have been attracted to its $199 price – less than half the cost of an iPad — what many don’t realize is that in the long run Kindles can be more expensive to own than other tablets.

Getty Images

Consumers snatched up an estimated 6 million Kindle Fires last quarter, according to Jordan Rohan, an analyst for Stifel Nicolaus — making it the second most popular tablet on the market after Apple’s iPad. At just $200 a pop, the price of the Fire is hard to beat, says R.J. Hottovy, an equity analyst for Morningstar who covers But differences in the way people use the competing devices could actually lead Kindle Fire users to spend more cash on content such as books, movies and games than iPad users do, experts say. While the Kindle Fire has tablet capabilities, allowing users to stream videos and play games, most people still use them for e-books, says Alex Goldfayn, chief executive of the Evangelist Marketing Institute, a technology consulting firm. “People are still buying the Kindle Fire probably to read books first,” says Goldfayn. “The additional tablet capabilities are a nice bonus.” (Amazon declined to comment.)

Indeed, Kindle Fire owners surveyed by RBC Capital Markets said they mainly use the device for reading, with 80% of Fire owners surveyed saying they have bought e-books and the average user buying about five e-books each quarter, and roughly three paid apps. iPad users, on the other hand, are more likely to use their devices with less expensive apps that let them video chat, stream media and play games, says Goldfayn. Consider, the average app costs $2.99 while the average e-book costs $9.99, according to estimates from RBC Capital Markets. And many more apps are available for $0.99 or less, adds Goldfayn.

Analysts estimate that Amazon actually loses money on the Kindle Fire hardware. While it sells for $199, it costs roughly $202 to make, according to estimates from RBC Capital Markets. Throw in marketing and shipping costs and Amazon could be losing roughly $18 for each Kindle Fire it sells. But the company makes up some of that loss in the revenue it reaps from content purchased on the device, says Hottovy. For instance, RBC estimates that Kindle Fires generate an additional $136 each in income for Amazon over the lifetime of the device, most of that due to revenue from e-books. And while Amazon may be earning more than $100 on content sales from each Fire, consumers are actually spending much more. Every five e-books generates about $15 in revenue for Amazon, but the books cost consumers roughly $10 each, according to RBC.

To be sure, the low price of the Kindle Fire may be appealing to a different customer than the iPad, says Hottovy. “The low price point is probably the most compelling aspect more than anything else,” says Hottovy, who expects the price to stay close to $200 in the near term. And despite the fact that many users primarily turn to the Fire for e-books, Amazon has enough digital content available in terms of video, music and other media to make it a competitive tablet device, according to a report by Forrester Research. Also, the popularity of the Fire could spark the development of more Android based tablet apps, the report says.


We welcome thoughtful comments from readers. Please comply with our guidelines. Our blogs do not require the use of your real name.

Comments (5 of 24)

View all Comments »
    • The iPad is super sexy stuff and the kindle is mere kindling ready for a match.

    • check this link, chanel 2011 with low price

    • The Kindle costs more because people buy more expensive things for it? That doesn’t make any sense what kind of logic is that to base an article on? They’re comparing users doing different things on each, that isn’t a cost comparison that’s just idiocy. How about doing a cost comparison on using both of them as e-readers instead of comparing users reading books on the kindle to users playing angry birds on an ipad.

    • I agree with theme of the other comments, faulty logic. This is the worst article I have ever read in WSJ. If the editors continue to fill up the pages with such tripe, I will be canceling my subscription!

    • I’m not sure how buying books equates to making the Kindle more expensive. If I didn’t have the Kindle, I’d buy the hard copy of the book anyway. If I had an iPad, I’d still buy the book and use the Kindle app. So I don’t really understand the logic here. If I spend $50 in books that I would spend no matter what tablet I had, then spend $500 for an iPad, how is that cheaper than $200 for a Fire plus the $50 in books? Plus, as Vince said, there are lots of free books, and I have yet to pay for an app either (I check the app store everyday to see what the free app of the day is!).

About Real-Time Advice

  • How breaking news — in the markets, Washington, and around the world — affects you and your money. Have a question about how current events may change your financial future? Email us at